Pros and Cons of Mandatory GMO Labeling

by | January 27, 2023

Mandatory GMO – or bioengineered (BE) – labeling remains a hotly debated topic. Admittedly, the facts can be confusing.

For starters, it’s a lot more prevalent than most consumers realize. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), up to 92% of corn has been bioengineered, 94% of soybeans, and 96% of cotton. Some estimates suggest that three-quarters of food in the average grocery store has been bioengineered in some way.

But, if you ask consumers, they’re still deeply divided about BE foods. For example, a 2020 Pew Research Center study found that 51% of Americans believe that BE foods are bad for their health. 

Whether it’s because of the increasing prevalence of BE foods, or the growing public mistrust of them, Congress passed the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard in 2016, which charged the USDA with establishing a labeling standard for BE foods.

In short, the law requires BE labeling for food and beverages intended for human consumption that contain more than 5% bioengineered ingredients.

Exclusions include:

– Foods derived from animals, such as eggs, meat, and milk
– Refined ingredients, such as oils and sugars
– Food served in a restaurant
– Foods manufactured and sold by small producers (local shops, etc.)
– Any non-food products

The labels must appear in one of three ways:

1. As text on food packaging
2. As a symbol identifying bioengineering
3. As a scannable electronic or digital link

Drafted on Feb. 19, 2019, this rule’s implementation didn’t go live until Jan. 1, 2020. However, smaller manufacturers had until Jan. 1, 2021, while mandatory compliance didn’t kick in until Jan. 1, 2022.  

Is BE labeling good for consumers? Could it hurt manufacturers that use BEs in their products?

It’s tough to take one side or the other. To help clarify the topic, we’ve assembled a list of some pros and cons of mandatory GMO labeling.

Mandatory vs. voluntary labeling

There’s a difference between mandatory and voluntary BE labeling. First, voluntary labeling is more about marketing to consumers, letting BE-conscious shoppers know products don’t contain bioengineered ingredients.

On the other hand, mandatory labeling goes significantly further and requires all food products containing BE ingredients to inform consumers.

Pros of mandatory GMO labeling

Right to know: Consumers have a right to know what’s in their food. And if a consumer is concerned about BE ingredients in their food products, labeling will help with their buying decisions.

Helps certain religions, vegans, and vegetarians: By adding labels to BE products, vegetarians, vegans, and those practicing certain religions can quickly determine if a product is modified.

Everyone else is doing it: At least 64 countries worldwide, including the European Union, Australia, Brazil, China, Japan, and Russia, have at least some BE labeling requirements for foods. And most U.S. consumers support mandatory BE labeling.

Cons of mandatory GMO labeling

Lack of understanding: While consumers can quickly determine which products contain BE ingredients with an implemented labeling system, a sizable segment of the population still doesn’t entirely understand what the terms “genetically” or “bioengineered” mean. This lack of awareness could hurt many manufacturers, as consumers might view the label as a warning. For example, a 2015 FooDS survey revealed that roughly 80% of Americans support the mandatory labeling of GMO foods “produced with genetic engineering.” Still, they also said they would support “mandatory labels on foods containing DNA.”

Costs might trickle down: Manufacturers still argue the overall implementation costs are prohibitive and might eventually trickle down to consumers’ pockets, driving prices up in grocery stores.

There are already non-GMO products: For consumers who prefer non-BE products, they’re already on store shelves.

With mandatory BE labeling, it’s more important than ever that manufacturers know exactly where their ingredients come from and what each lot shipment’s specifications are to ensure they’re always in compliance with whatever appears on the label of finished products.

TraceGains has built a Networked Specification Management solution that makes the specification process fast and easy. As a result, companies can quickly create, publish, and update raw material and finished goods specifications, automating tedious change management and version control processes.

Related Content

The Form 483 Solution — What You Need to Know

The Form 483 Solution — What You Need to Know

FDA inspectors issue Form 483s when issues are found at a facility. Corrective actions may be required so it's ...
A Look Inside TraceGains Network

A Look Inside TraceGains Network

A look at the capabilities of TraceGains Neworks and how it helps both customers and suppliers.
The Future of Supplier Data Management

The Future of Supplier Data Management

Who could have guessed – even just a decade ago – that something as mundane as a food label would be the focus of ...

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This